172 Blockchain
Successful products like Ethereum, Hyper ledger, R3 Corda,
Consensys Quorum and IBM Blockchain have established themselves
on a global scale, so it would be difficult for new entrants to sig-
nificantly challenge them. However, there are many start-ups provid-
ing a product and platform utilising the open-source products like
Ethereum and Hyper ledger. These entrants in the future might create
a challenge to the established blockchain solution providers due to
their unique features, simplicity, low cost and so on.
Also, once a common protocol and framework to provide interop-
erability between different blockchain products has been adopted in
production/mainstream use cases, it would be easy for companies to
use multiple products as per their use cases. This would make it easier
for buyers to switch to a similar substitute easily.
• Rivalry among existing competitors: High for Blockchain products:
How many competitors are in the market with similar capabilities?
Too many competitors with similar products can provide bargain-
ing power and switching capabilities to the buyers and suppliers. The
opposite is true if there is a player with unique capability that is dif-
ficult to replicate. An industry is attractive and profitable if there are
few strong suppliers and less substitutes and it is difficult or expensive
for new players to enter the market.
As there is a lack of blockchain common standards, every blockchain
product provider is trying to increase the footprint in the market hop-
ing to monopolise the standards and footprint of their own product.
For instance, R3 Corda is increasing the footprint in financial and
other markets to establish themselves. IBM Blockchain and ConsenSys
are also increasing their customer base to win more business. In sum-
mary, there is heavy competition and rivalry between a small number
of large-scale blockchain products and solution providers. Blockchain
is still going through a maturity journey for mainstream use cases. As
the blockchain interoperability improves through common protocols,
frameworks and standards, there will be more choices to the buyers and
suppliers. This will reduce the rivalry amongst existing competitors.
Multiple new entrants are inventing products and services based
on open-source products. They are differentiating themselves through
unique features, simplicity and interoperability. This will significantly
reduce the rivalry between existing competitors as there will be a vari-
ety of products for niche use cases.
Summary
As mentioned before, there has not been a single successful player yet, who can
convince customers to adopt their blockchain product. There are high numbers
of competitors fighting for a share of consumers. This rivalry will go on for
another few years until a few players convince the customers to adopt to their
products by producing common standards and simple and seamless blockchain
product deployment with unique functionalities with a value proposition.